Comments
on the motivation
Our
history tells us unmistakably not to close the eyes on wrong
occurrences happened in the past as happening presently, but
designating such issues clearly and obviously in order to
de-legitimize it and preventing thereby a possible ominous history
repeating.
This
claim of a perception of responsibility has led to the
proclamation of human rights as a result of the historical
occurrences of the 20th century. Thereby the human right of
freedom of speech covers the elementally importance making ominous
developments already in the approach recognizable in order being
in the situation to handle such kind of issues in generally. From
our history, we must recognize that restrictions of human rights
have led that human rights has been disregarded by companies,
organizations and institutions and the violation has been ignored
by regulatory authorities, public officials and judicial
authorities, which has caused that this occurrences have made
possible in our history.
Without
a doubt, this is the essential reason why the right to freedom of
speech must not be restricted by a potentially detrimentally
public perception of companies, organizations and institutions.
Exactly, this correlation has been stated by the European Court of
human rights several times already. Despite their historical
failures by complicity and
|