| 
 Comments
   on the motivation
 
Our
   history tells us unmistakably not to close the eyes on wrong
   occurrences happened in the past as happening presently, but
   designating such issues clearly and obviously in order to
   de-legitimize it and preventing thereby a possible ominous history
   repeating.
 
This
   claim of a perception of responsibility has led to the
   proclamation of human rights as a result of the historical
   occurrences of the 20th century. Thereby the human right of
   freedom of speech covers the elementally importance making ominous
   developments already in the approach recognizable in order being
   in the situation to handle such kind of issues in generally. From
   our history, we must recognize that restrictions of human rights
   have led that human rights has been disregarded by companies,
   organizations and institutions and the violation has been ignored
   by regulatory authorities, public officials and judicial
   authorities, which has caused that this occurrences have made
   possible in our history. 
Without
   a doubt, this is the essential reason why the right to freedom of
   speech must not be restricted by a potentially detrimentally
   public perception of companies, organizations and institutions.
   Exactly, this correlation has been stated by the European Court of
   human rights several times already. Despite their historical
   failures by complicity and 
    |