|
Law case: 9 Ga 129/15
Date: 05.09.2105
|
|
My dismissal
|
|
I
was dismissed in an ad hoc way after returning from a short
vacation break
Before
Karin Martin together with Jochen Strobl had been acted against me with
a threatening behavior
The
symptom of a compulsory redundancy would be to finish the current
tasks in a
smooth way by ending the employment with a farewell
drink
After
my dismissal TMJP started their Cloud campaign
Because
of security aspects are cloud solutions always based on
UNIX/LINUX technologies
That's
all indications that my dismissal was based on bullying attacks
and not caused by compulsory redundancy
|
|
My
legal viewpoint
|
|
My
public documentary is a legal procedure referring article 10 of
the ECHR
The
human rights has been declared due to that mankind is not to be
compelled to have
recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion
against tyranny and oppression
The
tyranny wasn't established by some evildoers but by the
unconsidered doing of
many people
That's
the reason why documentaries cannot be prevented by interim
injunctions
otherwise it would not be possible to oppose against
a re-establishment of a system
of injustice
The
acting of people relating to my dismissal was surely caused by
unconsidered
doing of them
|
|
My
Expectation
|
|
Compensation
of the lost of my private pension insurance
Compensation
of the lost of my private health insurance
Compensation
of the enormous overtime hours during my employment
Compensation
to the interruption of my career advancement to directors level
Compensation
for using my Backup/Recovery solution as baseline of
TMJP's cloud solution
Compensation
for the mental suffering caused by the bullying attacks preceding
my dismissal
|
