|
|
|
|
|
For
specific case documentation please consider the Links bellow!
|
|
Unfortunately,
the German legal system often has a propensity to prescribe people
how they should have interpreted Article 19 of the UDHR.
Every historian will hereby recognize those mechanisms, which can
not remain hidden us as major causes of the worst injustice system
of the human history.
|
Everyone with
rationality arises therefore the question, when will by this legal
system finally perceived that responsibility due to its burdened
past and follows a turnaround of its unreflective claim which
neither will be covered nor justified by any laws with universal
validity, beginning from the Universal Declaration of human
rights, over the European Convention of human rights
until to the German Constitutional Law. With this claim, we
must certainly recognize that attitude of an obscure sense of
Justice, which is preserved us by the quotation of Roland
Freisler's "we need no law, who is against us, will be
destroyed" and which keep us in mind the risk of a
re-establishment of a system of injustice based on a supposedly
constitutional-oriented legal system through disregarding of laws
with universal validity.
|
|
We
must ever again recall to our memory that in any existing
injustice system ever the injustice was not assumed by other
groupings than judicial and executive authorities or military
organizations. Also we have to remember the findings of scientific
historical research, according to which the emergence of a
injustice system can not be traced back to a sudden appearance of
monsters, but must be attributed always to the unreflective
behavior of individuals (highlighted by members of the judicial
and executive authorities). Moreover, we must remember also, that
there is no fundamental different characterized properties between
workers of the offender organizations of the injustice system and
workers of the current successor institutions. Once and now people
who decided to work for executive and judicial authorities
commonly prefer a dominant State power contrary to the rights of
individuals and are thus already conditioned to the unreflective
and unscrupulous allegiance. Before this background to abandon our
obligation of vigilance against the acting of members of judicial
and executive authorities, would be tantamount to that historic
failure of humanity which has made possible by the practice of
seeing away the outrageous occurrences of the 20th century in a
supposedly civilized and cultural society.
|
|
|
|
|
Be
committed to the postulate of his responsibility of the burdened
German history as well as be accused never again of looking away,
has the author of this site prompted to rely on Article
19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to
document those legal cases publicly, which must be written
undoubtedly, again arising by the acting of members of judicial
and executive authorities to a threat of a re-establishment of an
injustice system by disregard or circumvent of fundamental human
rights. Those who bending today the law depending on preferences
and willfully violating the letter of the laws, will tomorrow
undoubtedly apply again those monstrous violations of human
rights, whose sinister shadow still hovers as a dark shadow over
the German presence. Again as once, the culprit will than again
rely on their called mere duty and will justify their practices of
bending the law or abuse the rights as arranged by higher
instances. To let it not happen again is for the author a
mandatory obligation to our disastrous history
|
|
The
German judicial system intentionally ignores that legal peace and
legal certainty can occur only, if compared to individual
fundamental right holders simultaneously the inviolability of its
freedom rights in accordance with article 1 paragraph 2 of
Constitutional Law will be ensured or will be restored through
reversal by the consequence elimination due to illegal violation
of fundamental rights in accordance with article 19 paragraph 4
sentence 2, half-sentence 2 of the Constitutional Law.
|
|
|